Michigan Land & Iron Co. v. Thoney
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Marquette. (Stone, J.) Ejectment. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Champlin, O. J.
Plaintiff brought an action of eject*227inent. The defense is adverse possession for 15 years.
In 1874 the Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon Kailroad Company was the owner in fee of section 35, township 50 N., of range 26 W., in Marquette county. This section is fractional, and was divided, in the United States surveyor general’s office, into lots numbered 1, 2, 3, and 4, lot 1 being most northerly. On September 3, 1874, defendant John Thoney entered into an agreement with the railroad company for the purchase of this fractional section, for $3,489, He paid $1,000 down, and agreed to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bloomer v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Buell v. IrwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Ryder v. FlandersMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Bower v. EarlMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Dawson v. Danbury BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moran v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Kelso v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Barker v. KlinglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Olin v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Thompson v. DooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.