Legal Opinion
Little Falls Fibre Co. v. Henry Ford & Son, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerrick, J.
Motion in ivhich the plaintiffs ask for an order directing the removal by the defendant of flashboards heretofore installed by it on the crest of the main spillway of the Federal dam in the Hudson river near Troy, N. Y., and to restrain the further use of the flashboards on the dam during the pendency of this action.
To intelligently pass on the motion as presented, it is necessary to first consider the facts leading up to this litigation between the parties.
About the year 1826 the State of New York constructed a dam in the Hudson river at Troy with a crest elevation of thirteen and two-tenths…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bellinger v. . the New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Corning v. . Troy Iron and Nail FactoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Sammons v. . City of GloversvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Viestenz v. Arthur TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Viestenz v. Arthur TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952