Legal Opinion

Viestenz v. Arthur Township

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1952No. File 7278Published

1Opinion of the Court

54 N.W.2d 572 (1952)

VIESTENZ et al.

v.

ARTHUR TP. et al.

No. 7278.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

July 29, 1952.

Roy K. Redetzke, Fargo, for appellants.

Leland J. Smith, Fargo, for respondents.

GRIMSON, Judge.

This is a suit in equity for a mandatory injunction. As grounds therefor plaintiffs allege that the defendants in constructing the public highways bounding plaintiffs' lands failed to do that in accordance with scientific highway construction and engineering; that they have obstructed the natural drainage of the surface waters by the embankments of the highway; that as a result thereof the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. People of N.Y. v. . Canal Board of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Donaldson v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  5. O'Brien v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API