Wemple v. Yosemite Gold Mining Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. H. A. Blanchard, for Yosemite Gold Mining and Milling-Company, Appellant. J. P. O ’Brien and Crittenden Hampton, for P. P. Britton, Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Foreclosure of mortgage. Plaintiff had judgment from which and from the order denying their motion for a new trial, all the defendants, except the Yosemite Gold Mining Company, appeal. After the complaint, was filed, the Yosemite Gold Mining and Milling Company was made a party defendant as the grantee of the Yosemite-Gold Mining Company. The Yosemite Gold Mining Company (hereinafter referred to as defendant company) executed its mortgage to one Joseph Marsden, plaintiff’s assignor,, on October 25, 1899, which was, on October 27, 1899, duly recorded in the office of the county recorder of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Savings Bank of San Diego v. Central Market Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Shaffer v. McCloskeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Carpentier v. BrenhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Hines v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Darrough v. Herbert Kraft Co. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Evalina Gold Mining Co. v. Yosemite Gold Mining & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Castle v. SchulmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Parcells v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Robin v. CrowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020