Legal Opinion

United States v. Siroky

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 9, 1995No. ACM 30646 (Recon)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT UPON RECONSIDERATION

BECKER, Judge:

This case requires us to again examine the limits of the so-called “medical exception” to the hearsay rule, codified at Mil.R.Evid. 803(4), as it applies in eases of alleged sexual child abuse. We previously released our opinion as a panel decision on 2 May 1995.1 On our own motion we have reconsidered our decision en banc. We adhere to our original decision.

Despite his pleas, members convicted the appellant of one specification of rape of his infant daughter (in violation of Article 120, UCMJ2), one specification of sodomy of the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. DelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. SirokyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. SirokyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. SirokyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API