Danzig v. Jack Grynberg & Associates
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RACANELLI, P. J.
—This appeal is taken by defendants Jack J. Grynberg, doing business as Jack Grynberg & Associates, and his wife Celeste Gryn-berg, from a judgment rendered by the court (sitting without a jury) in favor of plaintiffs individually and as class representatives of all limited partner investors in an oil and gas limited partnership known as the “Greater Green River Basin Drilling Program 72-73” (hereafter GGRB). Following an extended trial the court entered its judgment in favor of plaintiff class on a theory of rescission grounded upon findings of fraudulent…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commercial Money Center, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Patricia Burdett v. Robert S. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Blankenheim v. E. F. Hutton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Hinesley v. Oakshade Town CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.