Legal Opinion
Friede v. Jennings
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 9, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
This action was brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff Friede, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, is receiver of the Joint Stock Land Bank of Minnesota and has been duly appointed by the United States District Court for the district of Minnesota as receiver to collect an assessment made in that court against all stockholders of the bank and that the other plaintiffs, all residents of that State or of the State of Illinois, are the duly authorized trustees for farm loan bonds issued or assured by the bank, who appear in their own behalf and that of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Clay v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Wheless v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Lewisohn v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- State Ex Rel. McClure v. NorthropSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Broderick v. McGuireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fairfield Lumber & Supply Co. v. HermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Friede v. BernsteinConnecticut Superior Court · 1936
- Kowalski v. KowalskiConnecticut Superior Court · 1950
- Newtown Pool Service, LLC v. PondConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.