Legal Opinion
Fairfield Lumber & Supply Co. v. Herman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 15, 1952PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
The question upon this appeal is whether the five plaintiffs, having been promised by the defendant that he would compensate them for labor and materials furnished by them in the erection of his dwelling house, may maintain a single action against him in the Superior Court when the amount in demand claimed by four of them, if treated individually, would be within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas.
The allegations of the complaint may be summarized as follows: All the plaintiffs either furnished materials or rendered services or both for the defendant in the construction…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Craft Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. Quinnipiac Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Veits v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Reilly v. Antonio Pepe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Equitable Trust Co. v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Pellegrino v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Brown v. CatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Bachman v. FortunaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Perrys, Inc. v. Waterbury Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.