Legal Opinion

Friede v. Bernstein

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 5, 1936No. File #51477Published

1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.

The moving parties here are the defendants, Grace Norton Dudley, Susan M. Jennings, Evelin M. Jennings, Edgar W. Bassick, J. Howard Russell and Harriet M. Russell.

This cause was returned to the Superior Court at Hartford County on the first Tuesday of June, 193?. The plaintiff is a receiver-trustee appointed by the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. The defendants, numbering fifty-seven with the exception of fourteen, live in counties other than Hartford.

All of the defendants are named as stockholders (or their representatives since their decease) in the Southern…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Condon v. Pomroy-GraceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  2. Lew v. BraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  4. Chambelis v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  5. Friede v. JenningsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API