Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage McNamara

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 30, 1983No. 81-11-295; CA A27085PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

In this dissolution case, husband appeals the amount and duration of spousal support and the division of assets. On de novo review, we affirm the award of spousal support and modify the division of the assets.

The parties were married in 1962. Husband is 48 and wife is 53. Husband is a salesman and earns an average net monthly salary of $2,100 to $2,300. He has been employed by the same company for the duration of the marriage. Before the marriage, wife worked as a bookkeeper. Except for an eight-month period, wife did not work during the marriage, and she is now unemployed. Husband is in good…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of FranzkeOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Matter of Marriage of MinnisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. In re the Marriage of HaftorsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. In re the Marriage of HaynerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Matter of Marriage of BarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In re the Marriage of DoeringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API