Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Doering

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 21, 1984No. 82-12-74426; CA A30105PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Husband appeals from a dissolution decree. He contends that the trial court erred in awarding wife permanent spousal support and attorney fees. Wife cross-appeals. She contends that the property division is not equitable. We review de novo. ORS 19.125(3).

The parties were married 20 years. They have two children, both emancipated. Husband, aged 41, is a civilian employe of the Air National Guard. He also is a member of the Air National Guard. His net monthly income is $1,580. He estimates that his monthly expenses are about $1,400. He is in good health.

Wife, aged 40, has a high school…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. In re the Marriage of SlausonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. In re the Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In re the Marriage of ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. In re the Marriage of PhippsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. In re the Marriage of HutchesonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. In re the Marriage of RischCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API