Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Franzke

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1981No. D13-784, CA 17673, SC 27716PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is a suit for dissolution of a marriage. The assets of the parties include three “accounts” belonging to the husband with his law partnership: a Keogh retirement account, an investment fund, and a capital account, having a total “face value” of $73,770. In considering the values of these accounts for the purpose of making an equal division of the marital assets, as agreed by the parties, the trial court undertook to determine what it referred to as the “present value” of these accounts to be $13,000, for the reason that the husband would not have the benefit of them until he retired from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Bloomer v. BloomerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. In Re Marriage of EpsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Matter of Marriage of SteinbrennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. In re the Marriage of AshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. In re the Marriage of BoghCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Cope v. CopeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API