In re the Marriage of Hayner
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Wife appeals the spousal support provisions of a dissolution decree, contending they are inadequate in both amount and duration.
The parties were married in 1951. They have five children; the three oldest are emancipated. Custody of the two younger children was not an issue at trial. Wife has custody of one daughter, age 18, who intends to attend college. Husband has custody of another daughter, age 14. He was ordered to pay wife $200 monthly child support. Husband, will also provide medical, dental and hospital insurance for the dependent children.
The parties divided their property prior to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of KitsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of LakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- In re the Marriage of PalmertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Marriage of SteinbrennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- In re the Marriage of SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Matter of Marriage of ClappertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- In re the Marriage of JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- In re the Marriage McNamaraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.