Legal Opinion

Ruud v. Ruud

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 29, 1985No. C9-84-2015PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Charles A. Ruud appeals the October 10, 1984, judgment in this dissolution case. The judgment resulted from a post dissolution proceeding in which respondent Diane M. Ruud (n.k.a. Diane Coppens) sought enforcement of appellant’s spousal maintenance obligation. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

FACTS

The parties were married in 1975, and separated in December 1982. They have no children. Respondent sued for dissolution.

During the marriage, the parties accumulated assets including 15 parcels of real property. At the time of dissolution, 13 parcels remained. The parties…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re the Marriage of Abuzzahab v. AbuzzahabCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Marriage of Powell v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marriage of Landwehr v. LandwehrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Ruud v. RuudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Marriage of Larkin v. LarkinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Jacobson v. World of Computers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Marriage of Eklund v. EklundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API