Legal Opinion

Marriage of Larkin v. Larkin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 8, 1987No. C6-87-1466PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IVERSON, Judge *.

Daniel Vernon Larkin appeals from the trial court’s amended order denying his motion for a new trial. On appeal, appellant contends the trial court erred in holding that Tier I Railroad Retirement benefits are divisible as marital property.

FACTS

On November 1, 1985, the marriage of Daniel Vernon Larkin and Monica Marie Larkin was dissolved by an order of the court. Matters of custody, property division, support, maintenance, and attorney fees were reserved for further hearings. On December 2, 1986, judgment was entered awarding Monica a property settlement, from other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Ruud v. RuudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pearson v. PearsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Pearson v. PearsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API