Marriage of Landwehr v. Landwehr
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This appeal is from the entry of an amended judgment and decree and the entry of a money judgment for property settlement arrearages. Appellant Rainer Landwehr had brought a motion to reduce monthly payments termed “alimony” in the stipulated judgment and decree. The trial court, finding ambiguity as to the nature of the provision, interpreted it to be part of the property settlement, denying appellant’s motion. The court also amended the judgment to impose security for the monthly payments. We affirm the construction of the judgment and reverse the imposition of security.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Metro Office Parks Co. v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Kerr v. KerrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Strouth v. WilkisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- VanderLeest v. VanderLeestCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carver v. HeikkilaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Marriage of Gunderson v. GundersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Cadle v. CadleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Cadle v. CadleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Eid v. HodsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.