Hepler v. Wright
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiffs bring the action to have their right determined to six inches of water measured under a four-inch pressure, for an injunction restraining defendants from diverting the same or any part thereof, and for damages in the sum of five hundred dollars for defendants’ alleged interference therewith.
It is alleged in the second amended complaint that plaintiffs Charles and Emma Hepler now are and for more than twenty years last past have been the owners of and have occupied, used, and farmed certain lands, to wit, lots 2 and 3 of block 7 of the town of Crescent Mills, Plumas County,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marcucci v. VowinckelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Miller v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- McKinnell v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Miller v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Wills v. WoolnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Peters v. BigelowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Barker Brothers v. JoosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Anderson v. Recorder's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Anderson v. Recorder's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.