Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Recorder's Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1918No. Civ. No. 2421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered on writ of certiorari. The only record on file is in the form of a typewritten transcript. Appellant has not complied with section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that upon such a record the parties must "print in their briefs, or in a supplement appended thereto, such portions of the record as they desire to call to the attention of the court." The brief for appellant is absolutely deficient, in that no part of the record has been printed therein.

On the authority of Stewart v. Andrews, 35 Cal.App. 230, [169 P. 397]; Jones v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. American Potash Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Hepler v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Stewart v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barker Brothers v. JoosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  2. Patten & Davies Lumber Co. v. InmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API