Miller v. Oliver
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County appointing a receiver pendente Ute. Frank H. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order appointing a receiver pendente Ute on the application of defendants. The order was one appointing W. J. Hersom receiver “of the real and personal property mentioned” in the pleadings for the purpose of protecting and caring for the same, and to manage the same as directed by the court. It was provided in the order that the plaintiff and his wife should not be removed from the premises unless so required by a subsequent order, and that plaintiff might be employed, if the receiver so elects, to assist him in such care and protection. The order…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bateman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- San Jose Safe Deposit Bank of Savings v. Bank of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by17 opinions
- Marsch v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Dahlberg v. DahlbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Luckenbach v. LaerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- McKinnell v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Barker Brothers v. JoosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.