Legal Opinion

Gilstrap v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 14, 1928No. A-5957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants,- were convicted in the county court of Muskogee county on a charge of having the unlawful pos session of mash fit for distillation, and were each sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

The record discloses that one Louis Gilstrap owned a rough farm about 5 miles from the town of Braggs. This farm was leased to defendants, who resided thereon, and who are brothers-in-law. At the time charged, two officers and another person went to this place, and about 240 or 250 yards from the residence house, in an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Penney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Merck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Cummings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Kelso v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ArnoldMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. ArnoldMontana Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API