Merck v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Dewey county on a charge of having possession of mash with the intent to violate the prohibitory liquor laws, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for a term of 90 days and a fine of $200.
The record discloses that in February, 1925, certain officers went to a canyon near the town of Putnam, where they had previously located some mash. On going across a tract of land before they reached the place where the mash was, they discovered a still in operation, with four persons about it,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reutlinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Penney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Findley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
- McConnell v. Security State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Jay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Dean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
- Cummings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.