Legal Opinion

Merck v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 18, 1926No. A-5624PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Dewey county on a charge of having possession of mash with the intent to violate the prohibitory liquor laws, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for a term of 90 days and a fine of $200.

The record discloses that in February, 1925, certain officers went to a canyon near the town of Putnam, where they had previously located some mash. On going across a tract of land before they reached the place where the mash was, they discovered a still in operation, with four persons about it,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reutlinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Penney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Findley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. McConnell v. Security State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Jay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Dean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Cummings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API