Cummings v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on a charge of having the possession of a still, and the defendant Cummings was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and to be imprisoned in the county jail for a term of 180 days, and the defendant Rice was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be imprisoned in the county jail for a term of 30 days.
The record discloses that on the date charged two officers were looking for one Bennett, a son-in-law of defendant Cummings, intending to arrest him for a misdemeanor, although they had no…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Penney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Merck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Sprinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gilstrap v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
- Brinsfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927