Legal Opinion

Cummings v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 21, 1927No. A-5737PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on a charge of having the possession of a still, and the defendant Cummings was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and to be imprisoned in the county jail for a term of 180 days, and the defendant Rice was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be imprisoned in the county jail for a term of 30 days.

The record discloses that on the date charged two officers were looking for one Bennett, a son-in-law of defendant Cummings, intending to arrest him for a misdemeanor, although they had no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Penney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Merck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Sprinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gilstrap v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Brinsfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API