Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 27, 1916No. 4882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Pontotoc County; A. H. Ferguson, Assigned Judge. Action by Archibald Holmes against Andrew Zimmerman. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DUDLEY, C.

This is an action in ejectment filed in the district court of Pontotoc county, Okla., by Archibald Holmes, defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, Andrew Zimmerman, as defendant.

The case was submitted to the court, a jury being waived by both parties. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, as follows:

“This is a suit brought by the plaintiff. Archibald Holmes, against the defendant, Andrew Zimmerman, in ejectment for the possession of certain lands described in the petition : W. ½ of N. E. ¼ of S. E. ¼ and W. ¼ of S. E. ¼, and S.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hayes v. BarringerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Noble v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Johnson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Neelly v. LancasterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  5. In re Poff's GuardianshipCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brokeshoulder v. BrokeshoulderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Marlin v. LewallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Routledge v. GithensOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Marris v. SockeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  5. Alto v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API