Legal Opinion

Noble v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1898No. 2810PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*134The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

The respondents, father and mother respectively of Judson D. Noble, deceased, brought this action to recover damages for his death, claiming that it was caused by the negligent, careless and wrongful act of the city in not keeping one of its streets in a safe condition for public travel. It appears from the record that in passing over a street in the city of Seattle known as Railroad avenue, which runs along the water front, the deceased fell through the planking and was drowned. The deceased at the time of his death was over the age of 21…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HouriganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  2. Henderson's Adm'r v. Ky. Cent. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  3. Atrops v. CostelloWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Jordan's Adm'r v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Whittlesey v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Copeland v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Johnson v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Robinson v. BaltimoreWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Higginbothom v. HigginbothomCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API