Legal Opinion
Marris v. Sockey
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 15, 1948No. 3655PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
The United States brought this action in behalf of Ned Sockey, a restricted Mississippi Choctaw Indian of 13/16ths Indian blood, enrolled opposite Roll No. 1308, t-o -cancel ,a warranty, deed executed -by Ned Sockey and his wife, on June 12, 1933, purporting to convey 110 acres of land to J. D. Hibdon, and to cancel certain instruments of record made by Hibdon and persons claiming through Hibdon, on the ground that such deed had 'not been approved by the Secretary of the Interior.
Forgy Marris, .also known as Virgie Sockey, was a, full-blood Mississippi Choctaw Indian,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Meister v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Reaves v. ReavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Bergeron v. BergeronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Johnson v. Johnson's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bertha Tatum v. Oscar TatumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Mpiliris v. Hellenic Lines, LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
- United States v. JarvisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Harsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Trower v. Board of County Com'rs of Curry CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.