Legal Opinion

Alto v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuknett, J.

The claimant, Hilda Jukkala Alto, was originally allowed compensation for the death of her husband in an industrial accident caso and was paid a total of $207.01 on the installment plan provided by the statute, but afterwards the Commission suspended the payments and rejected her claim. Being- a resident of Marion County of this state she appealed to the Circuit Court of that county, where the matter was tiled upon a stipulation of facts in which were cited the official character of the State Industrial Accident Commission, the death of Herman Alto, the decedent, while in the employment of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hudgens v. State Ex Rel. Mills, Co. AttorneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Wilcox v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Brokeshoulder v. BrokeshoulderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Howard v. KellyMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Brigham v. HughsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Parker v. American Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  2. Nicholas Ex Rel Nicholas v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gibson v. HughesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. French v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API