Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Barringer

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1909No. 2,773PublishedCited by 24 opinions

In Error to the United States Court of Appeals in the Indian Territory.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

In July, 1903, Sarah Hayes St. John, a full-blood Chickasaw Indian, duly enrolled and entitled to an allotment under Act June 28, 1898, c. 517, 30 Stat. 495 (the Atoka Agreement), and the Supplemental Agreement of July 1, 1902 (32 Stat. 641, c. 1362), devised all her property to the plaintiff, Ida Hayes, and died. Her will was probated and an administrator of her estate was appointed by the proper probate court of the Chickasaw Nation of Indians. This administrator selected 730 acres of the land of the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations, and these lands were allotted to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Stephens v. Cherokee NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Cherokee Nation v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Buster v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  5. Brun v. MannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Caesar v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. Taylor v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Chouteau v. ChouteauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Janklow v. Viking PressSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API