Branson v. Miracle
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
This case involves an alleged prescriptive easement to maintain a water pipeline and its appurtenances. It is a sequel to a decision reported at 107 Idaho 221, 687 P.2d 1348 (1984), hereinafter referred to as “Branson I.” In Branson I our Supreme Court affirmed Gorman Miracle’s right to water flowing from a tunnel on James and Martha Bransons’ mining claim. The Court remanded to the district court for a determination of Miracle’s right to enter the Bransons’ property to maintain the associated waterworks. On remand, the district court concluded that Miracle had…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Anchorage v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Lindokken v. PaulsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BowmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hunter v. ShieldsIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- Roberts v. SwimIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- Burnett v. JayoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- Branson v. HigginsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.