Legal Opinion

Branson v. Miracle

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1986No. 16149PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

This case involves an alleged prescriptive easement to maintain a water pipeline and its appurtenances. It is a sequel to a decision reported at 107 Idaho 221, 687 P.2d 1348 (1984), hereinafter referred to as “Branson I.” In Branson I our Supreme Court affirmed Gorman Miracle’s right to water flowing from a tunnel on James and Martha Bransons’ mining claim. The Court remanded to the district court for a determination of Miracle’s right to enter the Bransons’ property to maintain the associated waterworks. On remand, the district court concluded that Miracle had…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  3. West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. City of Anchorage v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Lindokken v. PaulsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BowmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Hunter v. ShieldsIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Roberts v. SwimIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Burnett v. JayoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Branson v. HigginsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API