Legal Opinion

Lindokken v. Paulson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

It appears without dispute from the evidence that the parties to this action and their respective predecessors in title were neighbors, friendly, and on good terms, until a short time prior to the commencement of this action; that for nearly fifty years no question was raised as to- the character of the use which the plaintiff made of the way in question. The record is barren of any evidence that plaintiff or his predecessor in title ever asserted any right to the way in question other than such as may be deduced from the fact that the way was used not only for transporting milk to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Curtis v. La Grande Hydraulic Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Meyer v. HopeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sachs v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  4. Scheller v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Naporra v. WeckwerthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hinman v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Feldstein v. SegallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  3. Shellow v. HagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Allie v. RussoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rovenko v. BokovoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API