Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Jayo

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1991No. 16806PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Lamar and Christine Burnett filed this action against Paul Jayo and his sons, Steve and Paul V. (Jayos), seeking damages for trespass upon the Burnetts’ property and for battery upon Lamar Burnett. The Jayos counterclaimed, seeking to enjoin the Burnetts from interfering with easements claimed by the Jayos over the Burnett property. The trial of these issues was bifurcated. The district judge, without a jury, first tried the counterclaim issues, deciding that the Jayos did not have any easements over the Burnetts’ property. Before the judge filed his memorandum decision…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. McBride v. Ford Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Gibbens v. WeisshauptIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Haman v. FoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bumgarner v. BumgarnerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Wood v. HoglundIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Anderson v. LarsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Burns v. AldermanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API