Legal Opinion

Tschantz v. Ferguson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 1989No. 89AP-43PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.

Defendant-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing this action and raises a single assignment of error as follows:

“The court below erred in holding Mr. Ferguson not entitled to immunity under Revised Code § 9.86 where the court so held without conducting a hearing, without requiring plaintiff to meet any burden of proof, and without finding whether the allegations of the complaint were true; Revised Code § 2743.02 requires the Court of Claims to ‘determine’ whether a state officer or employee is entitled to civil immunity”

Plaintiff originally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Trautwein v. SorgenfreiOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Goldberg v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Caruso v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. City of Riverside v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Elliott v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API