Legal Opinion
Tschantz v. Ferguson
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 22, 1989No. 89AP-43PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.
Defendant-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing this action and raises a single assignment of error as follows:
“The court below erred in holding Mr. Ferguson not entitled to immunity under Revised Code § 9.86 where the court so held without conducting a hearing, without requiring plaintiff to meet any burden of proof, and without finding whether the allegations of the complaint were true; Revised Code § 2743.02 requires the Court of Claims to ‘determine’ whether a state officer or employee is entitled to civil immunity”
Plaintiff originally…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
- Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Trautwein v. SorgenfreiOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Goldberg v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Caruso v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- City of Riverside v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Elliott v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.