Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Jordan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1935No. 25095PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiuliams, J.

Some interesting questions have arisen on the pleadings and the! opening statement of plaintiff’s counsel to the jury.

A motion was filed to the original petition and sustained ; thereupon an amended petition was filed. This amended petition sets forth that defendants Thomas Gregory and Irving Goldberg were the owners of an automobile and that “the Defendants’ automobile was caused to turn sharply to its left, or to the north on Oak Hill Avenue and before the same reached or passed beyond the center of Oak Hill Avenue and Kenmore Avenue [street], and before this Plaintiff had any knowledge or…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tschantz v. FergusonOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Will v. McCoyOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Baughman v. HowerOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Leach, Admx. v. NannaOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Wenzlanski v. Allen, Admr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API