Caruso v. State
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Lazarus, Judge.
Defendant-appellant, The Ohio State University Medical Center (“OSUMC”), appeals from the judgment of the Ohio Court of Claims that its employee, Dr. Reinhard Gahbauer, was not entitled to civil immunity pursuant to R.C. 9.86. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
Plaintiff-appellee, Myrna Caruso, worked as an administrative secretary for Gahbauer, Director of the Division of Radiation Oncology, at the James Cancer Hospital. Her job included handling correspondence, supervising secretaries for the division, and performing clerical duties related to the OSUMC’s residency and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Byrd v. FaberOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Thompson v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Chesher v. NeyerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Browning v. Ohio State Highway PatrolOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Chappell v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Culberson v. DoanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Siegel v. Univ. of Cincinnati College of MedicineOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.