Legal Opinion

In Re Samaha

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1933No. Docket No. 81PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

During the year 1932 petitioner resided in the city of Brawley, in Imperial County, and was engaged in farming about 130 acres of land near Calipatria, in the same county. On July 26, 1932, a complaint was filed with the justice of the peace of Calipatria township charging petitioner and his foreman with failing to pay Claudio Lares, a discharged employee, his wages, under the provisions of the wage law, Statutes of 1919, page 294, as amended. A similar complaint was filed on the same day, charging violation of the same act in failing to pay F. Galindo, a discharged employee, his wages. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Varcoe v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Gayton v. Pacific Fruit Express Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Fitzpatrick v. Sonoma CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. In Re OswaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. VejvodaNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Haviland v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. In Re GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. In Re MoffettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API