Legal Opinion

In Re Oswald

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1926No. Docket No. 1285PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The petitioner is in custody pursuant to a judgment of conviction of a mis'demeanor in that, after having become indebted to a laborer for wages amounting to three hundred dollars, then due and payable, the petitioner, although having the ability to pay, did wilfully and unlawfully refuse, neglect, and omit to pay the same, and did then and there wilfully and unlawfully and falsely deny the amount and validity of said indebtedness, with the intent to secure a discount for himself, and with the intent to annoy, harass, oppress, hinder, delay, and defraud his employee of said sum and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re NowakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. People v. HolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. In Re CraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. In Re BallestraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Haviland v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API