Legal Opinion
In Re Moffett
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 1937No. Crim. 406PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is a proceeding in habeas corpus to secure the release of petitioner from confinement by the sheriff of Tulare County, under a judgment of a justice of the peace sitting in Orosi township in that county, finding him guilty of violation of the provisions of sections two and four of an act which for convenience we will refer to as the SemiMonthly Pay Day Law. (Stats. 1919, chap. 202, as amended.)
The case has been before us twice before: In re Moffett, 12 Cal. App. (2d) 320 [55 Pac. (2d) 584], when we ordered the discharge of petitioner; and In re Moffett, 13 Cal. App. (2d) 741 [57 Pac.…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Miller v. SchoeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- McLean v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Patterson v. Bark EudoraSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. NederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- See's Candy Shops, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- City of Sioux City v. Michael Jon JacobsmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.