Legal Opinion

State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. Pealatere

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2000No. S-7507PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this appeal, the Alaska Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) challenges the superior court’s denial of its motion for reimbursement of public assistance. The superi- or court found that because a non-custodial parent met her child support obligation by relinquishing her interest in a portion of the marital property, she is entitled to an offset against the amount sought by CSED. During the pendency of this appeal, we issued an opinion in State, CSED v. Green, 1 holding that CSED possesses an independent statutory right under AS 25.27.120(a) to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richmond v. RichmondAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Adrian v. AdrianAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Patch v. PatchAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Perry v. NewkirkAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. GoldfussAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Olmstead v. ZieglerAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Schuyler v. BrinerAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Brandal v. ShanginAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Spott v. SpottAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API