Legal Opinion

Brandal v. Shangin

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2002No. S-9695PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal concerns property division and child support disputes arising from Henry Brandal and Lorraine Shangin's divorce. We hold that the trial court did not err in classifying Henry's right to use his grandmother's Chignik Lagoon land as a marital asset, or in valuing the original cost of this asset. But because we conclude that it was error to use compound rather than simple interest to calculate the present value of that asset, we remand for further calculations. We affirm the trial court's fifty/fifty distribution of the EXXON VALDEZ settlement…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Moran v. HolmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Adebowale Oluseyi Adekale A/K/A Ted AdekaleWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Odom v. OdomAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Ethelbah v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Harrower v. HarrowerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Rodvik v. RodvikAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API