Spott v. Spott
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Marvin Spott appeals the superior court's modification of his child support obligations. Because the trial court should have used actual income to calculate Marvin's retrospective obligation of interim support, we vacate the award of arrearages for the period between December 1, 1995, and July 1, 1997, and remand for recalculation based on actual income.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Marvin and Cheryle Spott were married in 1962 and separated on March 1, 1994. When Cheryle filed for divorce in September of 1995, two of their five children, Seth and Ethan,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Vachon v. PuglieseAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Matthews v. MatthewsAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Crayton v. CraytonAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- State, Child Support Enforcement Division v. BromleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Koller v. ReftAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Millette v. MilletteAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Faulkner v. GoldfussAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- McDonald v. TrihubAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Swaney v. GrangerAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.