Nixon v. Goodwin
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of El Dorado County, and from an order denying a new trial. M. P. Bennett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBuckles, J.
This action was brought to cancel a deed of conveyance executed and delivered to defendant William Dallas Goodwin on April 3, 1901, by Montauk Consolidated Gold Mining Company, a foreign corporation, upon the grounds that it was made with the intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors of said mining corporation, and to prevent the property of said corporation from coming into the hands of its assignee in insolvency, and to evade the provisions of the insolvent act of 1895. Defendant interposed a demurrer to the complaint on all the statutory grounds. The appeal is from the judgment in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Francisco v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Schnittger v. Old Home Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Babcock v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Snediker v. AyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Salisbury v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Armstrong Manors v. BurrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Charles Lomori & Son v. Globe LaboratoriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Heim v. JobesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Bank of America v. EnglemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950