Legal Opinion

Bank of America v. Engleman

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1950No. Civ. 17820PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Appellant sued for a declaration of its rights under an assignment for the benefit of creditors and to compel respondent to pay dividends on two promissory notes of the debtor. From a judgment denying that respondent was obliged to pay such dividends comes this appeal.

Two Notes of Debtor

On September 24, 1947, Mr. A. Austin purchased certain corporate shares and promissory notes from one Burcham. The latter was at the time an officer of the Belfast Bottling Company * herein referred to as “debtor,” the issuer of the shares and maker of the notes. By a written agreement the purchase price was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Rodgers v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Van Buskirk v. KuhnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Stuart v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Yamanishi v. Bleily & Collishaw, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Noord v. DownsWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Sandell, Inc. v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Silva v. GVF Cannery, Inc. (In Re GVF Cannery, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1995
  5. Adams v. HermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API