Salisbury v. Burr
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, granting a new trial. Lucien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Defendant and intervenor appeal from the order of court granting plaintiff a new trial.
The action was in claim and delivery to recover of the defendant sheriff a stock of groceries, fixtures, horses, wagons, etc., of the alleged value of two thousand *453-eight hundred dollars. The defendant denied plaintiff’s -ownership or possession, and justified his seizure and ■detention under a writ of attachment issued in an action between Perkins and Randall.. Upon March 15, 1889, the writ was levied upon the property as the property of Randall. The sheriff further showed that on .said March 15th, the day…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ohleyer v. BunceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Packer v. DorayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hass v. Whittier, Fuller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roberts v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Hanscome-James-Winship v. AingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Strange v. StrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Nixon v. GoodwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906