Legal Opinion

Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Commissioner of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 17, 2005No. A04-1324PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Relator Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy (MCEA) challenges respondent Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) grant of a permit to the City of Princeton- allowing the city to triple the capacity of its current wastewater treatment facility by constructing a waste-water treatment plant (WWTP) that will discharge 1,905,000 gallons of waste per day into an outstanding resource value water, the Rum River. MCEA argues that (1) the finding that there are no prudent and feasible alternatives to the proposed discharge is not supported by substantial evidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Resident v. NootSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Columbus & Franklin County Metropolitan Park District v. ShankOhio Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Request for Issuance of the SDS General Permit MNG300000Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Sayer v. Minnesota Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API