Legal Opinion
Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. Asper
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 5, 1988No. C4-87-929, C8-87-965PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Both employer, Geo. A. Hormel & Company (Hormel), and the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training (Commissioner) requested further review of a court of appeals decision concerning entitlement to unemployment compensation benefits of former striking employees at Hormel’s Austin, Minnesota facility.
The court pf appeals held: (1) the initial claims for unemployment compensation benefits filed immediately after the strike began were valid; (2) individual strikers who had tendered unconditional offers to return to work prior to the end of the labor…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Smith v. Employers' Overload Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. W. C. McQuaide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Mattson v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Hendrickson v. Northfield CleanersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re the Proposed Suspension, Revocation or Non-Renewal of the Nursing Home Licenses of Parkway Manor Healthcare CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Benda v. GirardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Matter of University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.