Riddle v. McLouth Steel Products Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.
We granted leave to consider a premises owner’s duty to warn invitees of known or obvious dangers and to determine (1) whether the trial court correctly instructed the jury that, pursuant to SJI2d 19.03, a premises owner must warn an invitee of known or obvious dangers; and (2) whether the jury instruction on violation of a safety regulation pursuant to SJI2d 12.05 constituted error requiring reversal. We conclude that the jury instructions given do not accurately set out the duty of a premises owner. Accordingly, we reverse the decisions of the lower courts and remand the case for further…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Williams v. Cunningham Drug Stores, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by257 opinions
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Hoffner v. LanctoeMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Bertrand v. Alan Ford, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
252 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.