State v. Kirby
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
This appeal requires us to consider whether various hearsay statements made by the deceased complainant to a police dispatcher, a responding police officer, and an emergency medical technician were “testimonial” and, therefore, inadmissible as violative of the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment to the United States constitution 1 as explained by Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 158 L. Ed. 2d 177 (2004). The defendant, Russell Kirby, appeals 2 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of kidnapping in the second…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. CanalesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. BasilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.