People v. Cage
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
In Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36 [158 L.Ed.2d 177, 124 S.Ct. 1354] (Crawford), the United States Supreme Court announced a new standard for determining when the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment prohibits the use of hearsay evidence—i.e., an out-of-court statement offered for its truth—against a criminal defendant. Crawford held that this clause protects an accused against hearsay uttered by one who spoke as a “ ‘witness[]’ ” “ ‘bearing] testimony’ ” (541 U.S. at p. 51) if the declarant neither takes the stand at trial nor was otherwise available for…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. Letner and TobinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. FryOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. RangelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.