Legal Opinion

People v. Cage

California Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2007No. S127344PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

In Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36 [158 L.Ed.2d 177, 124 S.Ct. 1354] (Crawford), the United States Supreme Court announced a new standard for determining when the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment prohibits the use of hearsay evidence—i.e., an out-of-court statement offered for its truth—against a criminal defendant. Crawford held that this clause protects an accused against hearsay uttered by one who spoke as a “ ‘witness[]’ ” “ ‘bearing] testimony’ ” (541 U.S. at p. 51) if the declarant neither takes the stand at trial nor was otherwise available for…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. Letner and TobinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. FryOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. RangelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API