Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2010No. 2008-1693PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Michael Arnold, appeals his conviction for raping his four-year-old daughter, M.A. Arnold argues that statements that M.A. made to social worker Kerri Marshall at the Center for Child and Family Advocacy at Nationwide Children’s Hospital (“CCFA”) were admitted contrary to his rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 10, Article I of the Ohio Constitution. The court of appeals affirmed Arnold’s conviction, holding that Marshall did not act as an agent of the police when she questioned M.A. and that M.A.’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. StahlOhio Supreme Court · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. State v. ClintonOhio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. ShelineOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. EcholsOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API