Legal Opinion

State v. Powell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1985No. 845SC585PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant seeks to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him, by motion to dismiss made at the close of the State’s evidence and his motion to set aside the jury’s verdict as contrary to the greater weight of the evidence. The record reveals that the defendant’s motion to dismiss was made at the close of the State’s evidence, but was not renewed at the conclusion of all the evidence. Defendant’s motion to dismiss was denied, at which time he proceeded to put on evidence. By presenting evidence at trial, defendant waived his right to assert the denial of his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. RushingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. HankinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. WorthamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API