State v. Boyd
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
The defendant’s first assignment of error is the denial of his motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s evidence. He did not make a similar motion at the close of all the evidence.
In State v. Mendez, 42 N.C. App. 141, 256 S.E. 2d 405 (1979), the court held that presentation of evidence by a defendant following denial of this motion and failure to renew the motion at the close of all the evidence is a waiver of the right to assert the denial as error on appeal. But we will consider the sufficiency of all the evidence here, pursuant to G.S. 15A-1227(d) and G.S.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. RedfernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. ChriscoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. ConcepcionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. ConcepcionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.